Should be satisfied that members of the group Anonymous bypass the justice of a rule of law to avenge the death of a teenage girl of fifteen, who claimed to be a victim of harassment for several years? This is the question that is asked in the case of hollow Amanda Todd, a Canadian high school student ended his life on October 10, at his home.Amanda Todd was twelve years old when his ordeal began. A chat room, she meets a man who invites him to unfold before the webcam - it ends up doing, lifting his shirt, revealing her femininity. The caller then capture the scene and began to spread across the web, especially among the friends of the girl.Victim of cyber-harassment, Amanda Todd must change several times schools. In vain. Her attacker gets the head of the track, repeating the operation every time with his new friends by broadcasting screenshots. By dint, Amanda Todd eventually drag a bad reputation with other students, sometimes suffering assaults and humiliations.Early September, Amanda Todd published a video on YouTube as a castaway launch a bottle into the sea She tells her story on small pieces of paper, his depression, his drinking and drug taking. To forget. To escape the hell that makes him live his executioner. "I have nobody. I need someone," she says at the end of the video.The publication of the video and the discovery of suicide obviously cause a shock wave in Canada. The disappearance of the young woman has reignited the debate of harassment, particularly on the web. Policies proposed to legislate on the subject, while justice gets underway to find the perpetrator of the teenager. Many investigators are mobilized on this issue.But the collective Anonymous has obviously not want to wait until the executioner be punished Amanda. Internet users claiming the movement decided to track him down and eventually find a name. A Kody M., a 32 year old Canadian. They also reveal his address in Vancouver, and claim that has fueled child pornography sites with content showing Amanda.Anonymous's intervention raises many questions yet. First, because it exposes a suspect to the mob, while the presumption of innocence should benefit the accused. Drowned in grief, drunken anger, relatives of Amanda may well seek to blame Mr. Kody, even though his guilt has not been established with certainty.It is justice to decide whether to convict someone, regardless of any moral consideration. The initiative Anonymous illustrates the risk form private militias, with netizens thought undoubtedly act for the good of others, without having the necessary skills and training necessary to substitute for police and justice.
Post a Comment